<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hail Federer May thy kingdom come&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kenneyjacob.com/2009/06/08/hail-federer-may-thy-kingdom-come/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kenneyjacob.com/2009/06/08/hail-federer-may-thy-kingdom-come/</link>
	<description>Disruptive Technologies, Modern Education, Shrouded Social Issues and Dirty media propaganda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:29:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Domestic Avalanche</title>
		<link>http://www.kenneyjacob.com/2009/06/08/hail-federer-may-thy-kingdom-come/comment-page-1/#comment-5325</link>
		<dc:creator>Domestic Avalanche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 17:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kenneyjacob.com/?p=2666#comment-5325</guid>
		<description>Absolutely great news. As he himself has said, we never have to hear about him not winning a Frech.

However, it lacks a little bit of the luster as his nemesis Nadal was not around in the finals, which would have made it more speacial. Remember when Nadal finally won Wimbledon? Were it been against Andy Roddick or someone, it would not have been as great.

On the other hand, he would still have been hailed as one of the greatest players ever to have entered a tennis court even if he hadn&#039;t won the at Rolland Garros. Pete Samprass did not, but still that doesn&#039;t make him a lesser legend. 

Guys... I&#039;ve been lucky enough to watch the wee end of Jimmy Connors, Edburg etc and then the amazing era of Samprass and Agassi. There have been a lull in  Men&#039;s tennis after that and now it is back. We are in a golden age of Tennis and we&#039;ll tell our grandchildren how we watched the great Federer and Nadal sweat it out in the Grandslam Finals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely great news. As he himself has said, we never have to hear about him not winning a Frech.</p>
<p>However, it lacks a little bit of the luster as his nemesis Nadal was not around in the finals, which would have made it more speacial. Remember when Nadal finally won Wimbledon? Were it been against Andy Roddick or someone, it would not have been as great.</p>
<p>On the other hand, he would still have been hailed as one of the greatest players ever to have entered a tennis court even if he hadn&#8217;t won the at Rolland Garros. Pete Samprass did not, but still that doesn&#8217;t make him a lesser legend. </p>
<p>Guys&#8230; I&#8217;ve been lucky enough to watch the wee end of Jimmy Connors, Edburg etc and then the amazing era of Samprass and Agassi. There have been a lull in  Men&#8217;s tennis after that and now it is back. We are in a golden age of Tennis and we&#8217;ll tell our grandchildren how we watched the great Federer and Nadal sweat it out in the Grandslam Finals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
