<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Language is for communicating, not for complicating.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kenneyjacob.com/2007/08/07/language-is-for-communicating-not-for-complicating/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kenneyjacob.com/2007/08/07/language-is-for-communicating-not-for-complicating/</link>
	<description>Disruptive Technologies, Modern Education, Shrouded Social Issues and Dirty media propaganda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 10:23:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#8216;Disruptive Technologies&#8217; - Blog Review &#171; Avid Blog Reader</title>
		<link>http://www.kenneyjacob.com/2007/08/07/language-is-for-communicating-not-for-complicating/comment-page-1/#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8216;Disruptive Technologies&#8217; - Blog Review &#171; Avid Blog Reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 08:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kenneyjacob.com/2007/08/07/language-is-for-communicating-not-for-complicating/#comment-396</guid>
		<description>[...] liked more than the technical articles on it, especially Falling in Love Vs Jumping into Love and Language is for communicating, not for complicating. The technical entries in the blog are also informative like How SMS Works. The author has allowed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] liked more than the technical articles on it, especially Falling in Love Vs Jumping into Love and Language is for communicating, not for complicating. The technical entries in the blog are also informative like How SMS Works. The author has allowed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.kenneyjacob.com/2007/08/07/language-is-for-communicating-not-for-complicating/comment-page-1/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 16:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kenneyjacob.com/2007/08/07/language-is-for-communicating-not-for-complicating/#comment-292</guid>
		<description>Simple is beautiful, I believe in this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simple is beautiful, I believe in this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vishnu Gopal</title>
		<link>http://www.kenneyjacob.com/2007/08/07/language-is-for-communicating-not-for-complicating/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Vishnu Gopal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 19:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kenneyjacob.com/2007/08/07/language-is-for-communicating-not-for-complicating/#comment-133</guid>
		<description>I agree. However learning to write in a complicated fashion seems to be the only way to communicate with lawyers, patent offices, etc. They seem to revel in such prose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. However learning to write in a complicated fashion seems to be the only way to communicate with lawyers, patent offices, etc. They seem to revel in such prose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jyothi M john</title>
		<link>http://www.kenneyjacob.com/2007/08/07/language-is-for-communicating-not-for-complicating/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Jyothi M john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 14:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kenneyjacob.com/2007/08/07/language-is-for-communicating-not-for-complicating/#comment-130</guid>
		<description>Hi Kenny
I think you are confusing with the two different concept&#039;s.
Language as a communication Tool - to relate to one another
Language as Literature - for the development of the language

Most of the time we confuse these two thing&#039;s and curse the language.
we are more comfortable with language as a communication tool - as that is what we use it for. but scholars care about the literature - the double meanings; the triple meanings .....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kenny<br />
I think you are confusing with the two different concept&#8217;s.<br />
Language as a communication Tool &#8211; to relate to one another<br />
Language as Literature &#8211; for the development of the language</p>
<p>Most of the time we confuse these two thing&#8217;s and curse the language.<br />
we are more comfortable with language as a communication tool &#8211; as that is what we use it for. but scholars care about the literature &#8211; the double meanings; the triple meanings &#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
